In fact, I started calling NATO global Robocop as early as 2010, 2011, 2012, because that was already obvious.Īnd then when we got under a fog of war, Rasmussen as NATO General Secretary, usually they get a deranged Scandinavian as NATO General Secretary. So the evolution or the involution of NATO as a global Robocop has been distinct year after year. Can I throw a bomb? OK, guys, look, I have had this pleasure of following virtually every NATO summit for the past 15 years or so. Maybe we can start with you, Pepe, since you are our guest. The first question we have is simply, where did the Vilnius Summit leave NATO? What are the principal features within the alliance that it exposed? So let me just start us off by posing the first one.
#Ashampoo winoptimizer 2019 full series
But why don’t we just launch into our conversation? We’ve decided to structure it around a series of questions. One could lengthen this list of the lies that surround NATO. The North Atlantic? What do you mean North Atlantic? NATO has long abandoned its alleged sphere of operation and it has penetrated more and more outside that sphere, not only within Europe, but is today, of course, as I’ve already said, preparing to penetrate the Indo-Pacific. In reality, the effort, the mountains of effort required to paper over the cracks that are widening in NATO are, in fact, no longer even enough. That’s what it did to the United Kingdom all those decades ago at the end of the Second World War. liked less and less as it began to include more and more countries from the third world.Īlliance? What sort of an alliance is it in which one about one member seeks to essentially damage and harm other members? That’s what the United States is doing, for instance, to Germany today. So there is no way in which this war is defensive.Īnd what’s more, it’s also was an offense against communism, of course, but it has also been an offense against the third world.Įssentially, NATO was also set up as a bit of a rival to the United Nations, which the U.S. It launched it against its own Second World War ally.Īnd again, the United States did this, you know, launched the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as part of this launching of the Cold War. launched more or less single handedly before the Second World War was even over. The fact of the matter is it was created as part of the Cold War, which the U.S. It calls itself a defensive alliance, defensive. So we have to try to understand we have to sort of push through all of this to try to understand what it is. So basically, NATO is a huge topic and it’s surrounded by a considerable amount of smoke and a vast number of mirrors. PEPE ESCOBAR: It’s a huge honor and pleasure to be with you guys and with this fantastic audience, of course. He’s a Brazilian journalist, geopolitical analyst and author. Many of you will, of course, know who he is. RADHIKA DESAI: And in order to do this, on today’s show, we are joined by none other than Pepe Escobar. RADHIKA DESAI: And today we propose to discuss NATO in the aftermath of its recently concluded Vilnius Summit, exploring a variety of questions about how its assault on Russia is faring and the prospects of extending its sphere of operations to what NATO leaders like to call the Indo-Pacific. RADHIKA DESAI: Hello, everyone, and welcome to the 15th Geopolitical Economy Hour, the fortnightly show on the political and geopolitical economy of our times.
0 kommentar(er)
